honest job of work for H.K., as
with
securing
his
future by allying himself with Brian Colquhmen 24
partners, which is a
not place full confidence.
hism in which the C.As do
not a
sanitary
engineer so
I cannot
whether Brunt is
a
say
charlatan,
am
but I have with and do not think much of
his behaviour, which strikes me as unscrupulous.
In this connexim
shd
ут
D.P.W's views.
a encl.,
see (31) which containe the
There seems to be sance confusion at the H.K. end
this subject
a
1
am
surprised that M' Besoring has not been brought into the picture more adequately. It seems essential to find out what H.K. have wish
we
to do now, as present arrangements.
are not getting anywhere
M
the
I accordingly submit a dft.
for consus. which has been agreed with Mr Hawtrey which is, I think, self explanatory.
One other point arises.
Dr. Her klots suggests in
now :-
A of his min. 23/8 that we shd approve in principle
an
the fertilizer scheme (a) H.K's (Dow allocatim being spent (by the scheme itself in toto, subject to future suggestions
by the H.K. Gast.
In B of the same minute, Jr Huklots suggests by implication
agree
a prepare an
that we
to Brunks offer in (30) shi interim coaw scheme to cover the cost of Brunts planning. While I fully agree with D' Herklots that this scheme is very important (see the memo. behind (1)) with all respect
to his suggestions. To
I cannot agree
my
mind, the
sufficiently firm prindations for us to
scheme is not on accept win his points (as o lbs.
ඒ
I do not like his third
point either since it is the equivalent of giving Brunt
a then saying
what will
you
do has this many? 3-5000 qus I do not place enough trust in Brunt ir Brian Colquhoun to do this. Instead I have inserted in para 4 of the off clear hint that we think the scheme of value, for the reasons the Gur' gives, provided it is put.
ал
think this is sufficient at this sitage.
a
satisfactory troting. I
as in d.h.
Co
كل
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.